Hello, Official Secrets Act
May. 1st, 2006 08:39 amThe Bush Administration is reportedly trying to come up with its own little Official Secrets Act. Given that they have said that the President can classify and declassify items at will, then hell, what can't they charge the press with?
THE MSM IS ALREADY YOUR STINKING LAPDOG, YOU BELTWAY SCUM. WHAT THE HELL ELSE DO YOU WANT? Oh, right, complete immunity to do whatever the hell you please, laws, Constitution, and liberty be damned.
In Leak Cases, New Pressure on Journalists
By ADAM LIPTAK
The New York Times
Published: April 30, 2006
Earlier administrations have fired and prosecuted government officials who provided classified information to the press. They have also tried to force reporters to identify their sources.
But the Bush administration is exploring a more radical measure to protect information it says is vital to national security: the criminal prosecution of reporters under the espionage laws.
[...]
One example of the administration's new approach is the F.B.I.'s recent effort to reclaim classified documents in the files of the late columnist Jack Anderson, a move that legal experts say was surprising if not unheard of.
"Under the law," Bill Carter, a spokesman for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, said earlier this month, "no private person may possess classified documents that were illegally provided to them."
[...]
"Once you make the press the defendant rather than the leaker," said David Rudenstine, the dean of the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law in New York and a First Amendment scholar, "you really shut down the flow of information because the government will always know who the defendant is."
THE MSM IS ALREADY YOUR STINKING LAPDOG, YOU BELTWAY SCUM. WHAT THE HELL ELSE DO YOU WANT? Oh, right, complete immunity to do whatever the hell you please, laws, Constitution, and liberty be damned.
In Leak Cases, New Pressure on Journalists
By ADAM LIPTAK
The New York Times
Published: April 30, 2006
Earlier administrations have fired and prosecuted government officials who provided classified information to the press. They have also tried to force reporters to identify their sources.
But the Bush administration is exploring a more radical measure to protect information it says is vital to national security: the criminal prosecution of reporters under the espionage laws.
[...]
One example of the administration's new approach is the F.B.I.'s recent effort to reclaim classified documents in the files of the late columnist Jack Anderson, a move that legal experts say was surprising if not unheard of.
"Under the law," Bill Carter, a spokesman for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, said earlier this month, "no private person may possess classified documents that were illegally provided to them."
[...]
"Once you make the press the defendant rather than the leaker," said David Rudenstine, the dean of the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law in New York and a First Amendment scholar, "you really shut down the flow of information because the government will always know who the defendant is."