charlie kirk got his wish, why are they complaining?

[solarbird]

Charlie Kirk was a vicious racist, misogynist, and anti-queer activist working to recruit anyone he could into his beliefs, someone who wanted LGBT people killed, who considered empathy a “new age” weakness and believed – and said outright – that any Black woman holding any position was too intellectually inferior to have it and so “stole” it from a white man.

And making all that into a durable political career became his life’s work.

Fuck Charlie Kirk. I’m glad he’s dead.

That he said and did all this vileness while dressed in a nice suit and in calm tones changes not one single goddamn thing, a fact which fucking nearly nobody has learned in over decades of the christofascist right performing the same. goddamn. routine. Say the most vicious, nasty, filthy, false accusations, slander and defame like a motherfucker, slime everything you can reach with contemptable evil, but do it all as a “gadfly” white heterosexual Christian man in a suit in careful tones and suddenly you’re “doing politics right.”

Fuck that, and for good measure, fuck Charlie Kirk.

He also openly desired bringing back public executions and said that children should watch them, and guess what?

He got his wish.

Somehow, though, pointing that out makes me the bad guy. Hilarious.

As always, his fellow-travellers were all-in on blaming trans people until it turned out his assassin was a groyper, a fan of human shitstain Nick Fuentes who hated Charlie Kirk for not being racist enough and misogynist enough. Kirk moving even further towards the fash in immigrant hate and anti-Black racism kept the peace between the two groups for a few years, but, well, Kirk saw the handwriting on the wall about the Epstein files and pushed for their release, and that was that.

“Oh noes, what are we to do about fascist on fascist violence?!” How about nothing. Yeah. Nothing sounds good. Or, I dunno, honour his last wish and release the Epstein files? That’d be nice.

But of course, I kid. Ha.

What is it, what is it, what’s the golden rule? Do unto others as you would have them do unto you? Well, an asshole did unto him exactly what he wanted done unto others, and I think that’s close enough.

So one last time: fuck you, Charlie Kirk. And you too, Fuentes, for good measure. And fuck you too, Gavin Newsom and anyone else who follows your example for eulogising and whitewashing this evil vicious fucker’s repugnant malignancy of a legacy.

He only got exactly what he wanted for people like me.

The irony, it is not delicious.

But it is, I think, entirely deserved.

Source. Source. Source.

Posted via Solarbird{y|z|yz}, Collected.

Comments

[kayla_allen]

He reaped as he had sown.

Any any sympathy I might have had for his widow went away when she announced that she's continuing his campaign of hatred.

[jessie_c]

His poor children though. They're going to get groomed.

[kayla_allen]

Unfortunately, probably so. If they are lucky, they will manage to escape, but the odds are not good.

[dewline]

Yeah, I am also pre-emptively done with any attempts at hagiography re: the dead and unlamentable Charlie Kirk.

[jessie_c]

Reddit's Onion Headlines sub had "Kirk loses gun debate by a long shot" the other day.

[arethinn]

pffft 🤣

[numb3r_5ev3n]

I like what one person said (I forget who already, but the quote is being tossed around and is probably viral at this point) "I may not support what happened to Charlie Kirk, but Charlie Kirk supported what happened to Charlie Kirk."

As for me, I figured this would turn out to be Groyper-on-Groyper violence since before we knew a single thing about the shooter.