MSFT is d0000000m3d. 16,000 employees on a product rev and buzzphrases like "integrated innovation?" It's 1975 at IBM all over again. Also, they're messing with the soda. Hope you like process bells on conference tables, folks - they're coming!
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2001973671_microsoft07.html
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2001973671_microsoft07.html
no subject
Date: 2004-07-07 09:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-07 10:15 am (UTC)It's when they start nickle-and-diming the employees that you have to start worrying.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-07 12:16 pm (UTC)Scott Adams (I think) pointed out that when your company eliminates the feminine supplies in the restroom, you're doomed.
Spring cleaning, sure, but figure out how much extra in salary you would have to pay to get the productivity you get by providing...caffeine!
Cathy
no subject
Date: 2004-07-07 10:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-07 10:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-07 10:19 am (UTC)I am seeing moral go down in that company, people are used to those perks, and even if your spring cleaning and it's good, it looks funny when the boss got 50+Billion in the bank and they take away your towels, or soda rights.
That, from what I was told, was the reason so many college kids have come to MSFT to work. Free Soda.
I didn't realize how much of a luxury that was till I worked for the State and had to find a coffee machine to borrow from someone. And I payed for water.
Steffi
no subject
Date: 2004-07-07 11:47 am (UTC)As for cutting out the perks? Well as I understand it MS was bascially using those perks as an incentive to make up for the long unpaid hours that were being worked. With the perks going, expect to see the unpaid hours to start going as well. Yes accountants don't understand that kind of thing, but that's why accountants don't run successful businesses.
I think MS's biggest problem isn't the perks, they should leave those in place. I think it's just they've got too many employees. About ten thousand too many. They're suffering bloat. If they want to become a big business like IBM, they have to make a lot of changes. OR they could stay the small business they always were. Personally I think they'll do better as the latter, but that's just me.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-07 12:40 pm (UTC)Or maybe I could cut all social ties and finish off the degree in one year and be done with it.
How fast is the boat sinking?
no subject
Date: 2004-07-07 09:13 pm (UTC)Oh, they've got so much money it's not even funny. They'll be around for quite a while. They just don't matter anymore. Not in good ways. Really, they haven't mattered that much for a while; this is the ossification setting in. Nickel-and-dime-ing will continue apace, and Balmer, et al, will continue to say everyone's happy and onboard with it until it's too late to staunch the bleeding and they have a crisis. They can afford a couple of crisises, too, so you've got nothing to worry about anytime soon.
But the next Netscape that comes around won't be nearly so easy to handle - assuming there's no artifical restraint of development, e.g., through the murderously abusive software patent system I've been screaming on and off about for the last several years. (Did you know Microsoft recently patented the double-click when applied to small screens? No, really, it's a granted patent. Neat, huh?)
no subject
Date: 2004-07-07 02:40 pm (UTC)And there was one VP who was very proud of the fact that he was "the guy who'd gotten rid of free coffee." It was such a small expense compared to the amount of employee morale they lost...
no subject
Date: 2004-07-07 06:22 pm (UTC)Eventually the company got the message, but it sure took them a while.