PHA is another bioplastic, newer and more expensive so far than PLA, but with a much higher glass temperature meaning it is far more heat resistant. But it's also harder to print.
In my last major update, I'd done a lot of testing and found that the high temperature claims are totally valid, but when I'd try to get 20% wood infill PHA to span, it largely failed. It prints objects with internal supports just fine, but spans are a real problem.
So I ordered some "natural" (no infill of any kind, not even colourants) PHA to experiment with that a bit, and I have some good news. While it still doesn't span with the preferred 0.6mm nozzle, and jams reliably with a 0.4mm nozzle, it turns out that if you slice for a 0.4mm nozzle and print with a 0.5mm nozzle, you get reliable prints... and get good spanning. Check this out:

PHA .4mm slice/nozzle, .4 slice but .5 nozzle, .6 slice/nozzle, 20% wood .6 slice/nozzle>
The worst 0.4mm slice/0.5mm nozzle print's spanning is better by far than the best spanning with a 0.6mm nozzle. And no jamming or hint of it even after 18 hours or so of printing.
I also printed a mini printer test object (pictures on Mastodon) and it did much better than I expected, with no failed overhangs, though the sharpest angle got pretty bad on the underside. But 50° is genuinely fine and 60° is acceptable.
It's not currently on discount at filaments.ca but they've had like 35% off in the past if you want to experiment with it. Also their US shipping got a lot better which is really nice. (I am not affiliated, that's just where I can order it without having to pay shipping from Germany.)
Anyway, I think this is an interesting plant-derived filament with some very interesting temperature resistance (to like 100°C) and I was dubious at first but it's genuinely viable. More difficult than PLA and more abrasive, but... genuinely viable.
In my last major update, I'd done a lot of testing and found that the high temperature claims are totally valid, but when I'd try to get 20% wood infill PHA to span, it largely failed. It prints objects with internal supports just fine, but spans are a real problem.
So I ordered some "natural" (no infill of any kind, not even colourants) PHA to experiment with that a bit, and I have some good news. While it still doesn't span with the preferred 0.6mm nozzle, and jams reliably with a 0.4mm nozzle, it turns out that if you slice for a 0.4mm nozzle and print with a 0.5mm nozzle, you get reliable prints... and get good spanning. Check this out:

PHA .4mm slice/nozzle, .4 slice but .5 nozzle, .6 slice/nozzle, 20% wood .6 slice/nozzle>
The worst 0.4mm slice/0.5mm nozzle print's spanning is better by far than the best spanning with a 0.6mm nozzle. And no jamming or hint of it even after 18 hours or so of printing.
I also printed a mini printer test object (pictures on Mastodon) and it did much better than I expected, with no failed overhangs, though the sharpest angle got pretty bad on the underside. But 50° is genuinely fine and 60° is acceptable.
It's not currently on discount at filaments.ca but they've had like 35% off in the past if you want to experiment with it. Also their US shipping got a lot better which is really nice. (I am not affiliated, that's just where I can order it without having to pay shipping from Germany.)
Anyway, I think this is an interesting plant-derived filament with some very interesting temperature resistance (to like 100°C) and I was dubious at first but it's genuinely viable. More difficult than PLA and more abrasive, but... genuinely viable.