dimmnitude
Feb. 23rd, 2007 05:55 pm"Conservapedia" is, I think, already being pretty well knocked about, but it really is a lollercoaster. Almost half its front page consists entirely of attacks on Wikipedia, and on apolitical topics, the best writing I've found is at the fifth grade report level. Here, compare and contrast:
Conservapedia on Beowulf
Wikipedia on Beowolf
I also like how its contributors quote FOX News as a scientific source. It's kind like the "Mirror, Mirror" Wikipedia, only instead of evil, it's stupid.
Conservapedia on Beowulf
Wikipedia on Beowolf
I also like how its contributors quote FOX News as a scientific source. It's kind like the "Mirror, Mirror" Wikipedia, only instead of evil, it's stupid.