okay, that was weird
Jan. 29th, 2009 04:55 pmTwo people in a red sedan license 556-STM (I think) just drove up to the foot of our driveway, took a picture from inside the car, (from the passenger side, and using a flash - lulz), checked the shot (or did something that looked like that), and then drove off.
So, um, wut? Any ideas? (Other than maybe, I dunno, Google street view filling in missed shots? Google's streetview shot of our house consists almost entirely of sunlight glare in the camera lens.)
eta: Paul said "real estate" thinking "real estate scam" and I realised it probably was real-estate related: it was someone looking for comparables. There are a couple of houses for sale near ours, including one that had an open-house last weekend. So I suspect they got an offer and now are going through appraisal.
So, um, wut? Any ideas? (Other than maybe, I dunno, Google street view filling in missed shots? Google's streetview shot of our house consists almost entirely of sunlight glare in the camera lens.)
eta: Paul said "real estate" thinking "real estate scam" and I realised it probably was real-estate related: it was someone looking for comparables. There are a couple of houses for sale near ours, including one that had an open-house last weekend. So I suspect they got an offer and now are going through appraisal.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-30 01:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-30 01:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 07:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-30 01:24 am (UTC)Two, actually.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 07:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-30 01:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-30 02:16 am (UTC)Keeping on your guard wouldn't be a bad idea.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-30 03:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-30 03:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-30 04:03 am (UTC)glad of it, ihoyanikû.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-30 05:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-30 03:11 pm (UTC)photo event
Date: 2009-01-30 05:21 pm (UTC)A measured, thoughtful response
Date: 2009-01-30 09:28 am (UTC)Re: A measured, thoughtful response
Date: 2009-01-30 03:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-30 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 06:30 am (UTC)turned out that a neighbor was requesting a zoning variance, and part of the application process included some pictures of nearby houses.