The futures sure love it
Sep. 19th, 2008 05:51 amBriefly: a "bad debt rescue plan" is pitched as something that "may" cost "up to" half a trillion-with-a-T dollars. It'll be more than that. There is also now a ban, albeit temporary, on shorting financials stocks. Marketwatch has an early AM bulletin: "FED TAKING NEW LIQUIDITY MEASURES, INCLUDING BUYING FANNIE AND FREDDIE DEBT" but no story; there is a short story on loans to prop up the money-market sector. Whup, a new one: oh look, they're guaranteeing them now - so much for all those little disclaimers on commercials about risk. The TED spread has dropped to 229 after spiking to a record 314, a massive drop; Dow futures are up 370 points. And the dollar is rallying.
But the Fed is still having severe trouble trying to reach its target rate, and had to float some 0% overnight loans to come close.
Also, it's kind of too damn hot in this room to sleep well. Foo.
But the Fed is still having severe trouble trying to reach its target rate, and had to float some 0% overnight loans to come close.
Also, it's kind of too damn hot in this room to sleep well. Foo.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-19 01:13 pm (UTC)So, we're applying the FDIC model to money market funds, in an attempt to get cash flow back IN instead of flooding OUT. Can't say I like that, but if I'm not mistaken, the alternative is that short term financing dries up completely...and I'm not sure I want to think what that does to the economy.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-19 01:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-19 01:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-19 01:39 pm (UTC)Story on CBC this morning, 0600 radio news, saying that Bank of Canada threw 10 gigabucks at "an international pool of banking support" whatever that means.
And absolutely nothing concerning possible Canada/EU deep integration. Would consider this as pre-election hot air, mostly. Conservatives, by the bye, really ARE floundering in the polls. NDP is climbing.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-19 02:07 pm (UTC)And go NDP! That would be two prayers answered if it holds...
no subject
Date: 2008-09-19 02:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-19 02:12 pm (UTC)Some opinions on personal finance requested
Date: 2008-09-19 01:57 pm (UTC)I've been working on paying down accumulated credit card bills from my younger, dumber days. On the current track, I figure on being totally paid off on them in three years.
However, if we're looking at recession or depression (ignoring for the moment the two are essentially the same)...should I be holding onto the cash instead of paying the bills down and off?
I can see arguments both ways, so I'm looking for outside input.
Re: Some opinions on personal finance requested
Date: 2008-09-19 02:09 pm (UTC)only reason to slow debt repayment would be if you were certain that your loan interest rates were not going to ramp upward. since credit cards usually float their rates, this is an unsafe assumption in most cases.
Re: Some opinions on personal finance requested
Date: 2008-09-20 12:07 am (UTC)Or to put it another way, if we're now in the kind of economy where it actually makes sense to keep open an outstanding loan at 18% interest because you're expecting inflation to overwhelm that and take care of the problem, that basically means we're in a whole new world now. And you had better be really sure of your current employer/employability.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-19 02:00 pm (UTC)If I'm not mistaken, the last time that liquidity dried up and confidence in the markets collapsed was....1929.
The problem for the governments is that the liquidity dried up BECAUSE confidence collapsed. Trying to restore confidence by pumping in liquidity doesn't seem to be working so well...but I haven't a clue as to the alternative approach.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-19 04:07 pm (UTC)http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2008/09/18/wall-street-crisis-not-quite-1929/
no subject
Date: 2008-09-19 03:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-19 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-19 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-19 11:49 pm (UTC)There are basically two possibilities here:
- Chris Cox, the head of the SEC, does not understand how markets work.
- he does, but optics/politics/looking-like-you're-doing-something trumps rational regulation and he otherwise doesn't give a shit
I really don't know which is worse.And here I was originally feeling stupid for having closed out my option and short positions on Tuesday only to see things slide further on Wednesday. I guess I had a sense that They were going to do something stupid, but ... Jesus Fuck.