Hm.
The return of cold fusion? The story covers a demonstration based on research documented in this 2003 paper, which was, in turn, a follow-up to a previous paper in 1994.
I'm not banking on this; I'm just noting it.
The return of cold fusion? The story covers a demonstration based on research documented in this 2003 paper, which was, in turn, a follow-up to a previous paper in 1994.
I'm not banking on this; I'm just noting it.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-01 10:48 pm (UTC)betcha never thought I'd advocate for non-carbon-based mineral fuels, hey? carbon is strictly a bridging technology to nuclear which in turns gets us the concentrated power to go to LEO solar/microwave. finding the money is a whole 'nother problem, though.... China will probably beat us to it; they have even greater need to solve the energy-flux problem than do we.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-01 11:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-02 03:19 am (UTC)where's my staking-tag book, anyway? and who has a burro? can't prospect without a burro ^_^
no subject
Date: 2008-06-02 01:51 am (UTC)When I first saw this I thought someone was finally picking up the Jones-Palmer muon-catalyzed-fusion work (which actually looked somewhat real, but got dropped on the floor because J/P made the mistake of announcing with Pons-Fleischemann rather than trying to distance themselves and so when the P/F results were shown to be bogus, their reputations got flushed, too...). oh well.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-02 06:42 am (UTC)Well, that's a test, but yeah.
When I first saw this I thought someone was finally picking up the Jones-Palmer muon-catalyzed-fusion work (which actually looked somewhat real, but got dropped on the floor because J/P made the mistake of announcing with Pons-Fleischemann rather than trying to distance themselves and so when the P/F results were shown to be bogus, their reputations got flushed, too...).
Yeah, I'd always wondered what happened to them, and didn't really know why they co-announced since their approach was materially different.