I noticed last night that percentage returns received stopped incrementing - and I'm pointed at news this morning by
kathrynt that it turns out the state GOP stopped counting ballots at 87.2% and just went ahead and declared McCain the winner. The Huckabee campaign is having no part of it and wants an explanation. Here's the Washington State Republican Party press release declaring for McCain.
Y'know what'd be better than stopping the count while the party insiders' preferred candidate is ahead and declaring him the winner? Counting all the votes, and then announcing a winner. The lead was going back-and-forth much of the night; this can't be considered definitive. If McCain doesn't win Washington State, then Huckabee had a sweep of all three GOP state events this weekend, and I'm sure there is a lot of pressure to prevent that.
ETA: Huckabee really doesn't like what's going on, and says "we're looking at some legal issues" in the count.
Y'know what'd be better than stopping the count while the party insiders' preferred candidate is ahead and declaring him the winner? Counting all the votes, and then announcing a winner. The lead was going back-and-forth much of the night; this can't be considered definitive. If McCain doesn't win Washington State, then Huckabee had a sweep of all three GOP state events this weekend, and I'm sure there is a lot of pressure to prevent that.
ETA: Huckabee really doesn't like what's going on, and says "we're looking at some legal issues" in the count.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-10 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-10 07:56 pm (UTC)Looks like Huckabee got the most votes up here. ugh
no subject
Date: 2008-02-10 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-10 08:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-10 09:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-10 07:49 pm (UTC)Or is it more likely that they worry he'd be uncontrollable? Am thinking back here to the unpredictability of Jimmy Carter...
no subject
Date: 2008-02-10 08:14 pm (UTC)And yeah, I could be wrong, at which point at least I'd know I'm wrong and could act appropriately.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-10 08:41 pm (UTC)And myself, have no vote to cast in this
fixedrace, but several spouses with whom to chew things through prior to Election Day, so it all works out even in the end. Probably all Democrats, FWIW.no subject
Date: 2008-02-10 10:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-11 01:28 am (UTC)cannedcalled (nice Freudian typo) it for McCain on projections and intelligent guesswork. Though Huckabee's still going to send in lawyers, and I can't say I blame him, it appears to be more a case of unfortunate wording than actual conspiracy.(and the count is as of this writing up to 93.3% of precincts)
no subject
Date: 2008-02-11 02:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-11 03:11 am (UTC)Our caucus was at the elementary school which is a couple of blocks from the middle school -- where the Republicans were holding theirs. They finished sooner than we did, so the custodian came down to hang out with our custodian and gab until we were done. He said they had something like 200-300 people there, and I'm pretty sure that was an island-wide caucus, while we had 4 locations with something like 700 people at each. Maybe they don't get as much action because some delegates are chosen by primary results, but I was still greatly amused (and also that the only signs I saw driving around the Island doing last-minute preparations were for Obama and Paul, with one visibly slapped together at the last minute Clinton sign).
The Republicans also clearly have a different system than the Democrats, because we knew most individual precinct results by around 3:30 and for each caucus location (in the 41st LD, thus totals for the district) by about 5pm Saturday.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-11 06:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-11 06:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-11 06:54 am (UTC)