An explanation someone else wrote
Dec. 28th, 2007 10:31 amOh look, here's a short article that does a pretty good job of describing why those insurer failures I posted about a little while ago matter: Seeking Warning Signs Outside Subprime Lending
The headline is stupid - we're long, long past this just being "subprime lending" - but the content is there. A complete unravelling would be $45 trillion. Yes, trillion. That's three times GDP and five times national debt. So everybody hope that's not going to happen, because if it does your best bet is to be long in things like booze, ammunition, and cigarettes - which is, in turn, a pretty good clue that it's not going to go down that badly. But the potential losses are still pretty huge.
The headline is stupid - we're long, long past this just being "subprime lending" - but the content is there. A complete unravelling would be $45 trillion. Yes, trillion. That's three times GDP and five times national debt. So everybody hope that's not going to happen, because if it does your best bet is to be long in things like booze, ammunition, and cigarettes - which is, in turn, a pretty good clue that it's not going to go down that badly. But the potential losses are still pretty huge.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-28 06:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-28 07:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-28 06:47 pm (UTC)The horror! The horror!
no subject
Date: 2007-12-28 07:08 pm (UTC)Oh, also, note that this is not technical trading advice because technical trading is reading tea leaves - meaning in the charitable sense an obtuse way to gauge market psychology - but if I'm reading these (not good enough for my tastes) charts correctly, the dollar has just fallen below the 50-day moving average, which was the last MA support it had. And if I understand the terminology correctly, the moving averages have also set up what's called a "death cross," which means the 50-day, which had been above the 100- and 200-day MAs, is now below it, which actually is I think reasonably indicative of market opinion.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-28 07:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-29 01:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-29 02:06 am (UTC)