torture states love ignoring you
Nov. 28th, 2007 11:44 pmI've been sending variations on this letter - different every time, of course - to my DC "representatives" every day or two for a couple of weeks now.
If you're local, here's Maria Cantwell's message webform, here's Patty Murray's message webform, and here's Jay Inslee's. I give obviously fake email addresses ("nothanks@nowhere.net") because I don't really want their email bullshit, but give real phone number and paper address information so they can reply, if they want to.
Dear {Senator|Representative} [foo] -No reply yet. Some of you might try it too. But you have to do it over and over again - at least, that's my hypothesis. I know outright that they'll ignore just one.
I hope you had a happy Thanksgiving holiday. Now that you're back: what plans did you make while back here in Washington to confront the Bush and Cheney administration over their torture regime? It is a continuous source of disgust and deeply personal anger that the United States federal government is engaging in the same wretched practices I wrote against as an Amnesty International Freedom Writer, and I'm very much interested in your plans to stop it. Immediately.
I look forward to a paper-mail response.
Sincerely,solarbird
If you're local, here's Maria Cantwell's message webform, here's Patty Murray's message webform, and here's Jay Inslee's. I give obviously fake email addresses ("nothanks@nowhere.net") because I don't really want their email bullshit, but give real phone number and paper address information so they can reply, if they want to.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-29 11:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-29 06:19 pm (UTC)I understand why our own Founding Fathers set things up the way they did... but we don't have the transportation and communications problems we once did that made that necessary. I also understand why the elections people are trying to do what they are trying to do... and some of it is a would-be panacea and some of it's graft and *none* of it is right.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-29 07:08 pm (UTC)I always bear in mind that although I am married to certain Yanks, and we are very close to taking in another to fill a space in our array, I am decidedly a **non**-immigrant spouse, would not consider giving up being a free-range Canadienne in a month of Sundays. Canada's been awfully kind to me, BC and Alberta especially (tho' in the case of Alberta, if they knew exactly what sort of wild harridan bodie I really am, they'd probably want to run me out on a rail).
Let's just say that if there are many more Callihanians like you around, the States'll be okay.
Oh, and the only reason the RCMP come to watch the ballot-count? We give em coffee, tea and Timmies. That's do it every time. Sides which, they are so dang cute in their red serge.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-29 07:29 pm (UTC)Can't say as I blame you for wanting to stay.
*LOL* the funny thing is that even though I've never been to one, I know enough Canadian culture to figure out what a "Timmie" is in just a few seconds... cops and their donuts *shrug* what can you do, eh? Feed'em more?
One wonders if you're familiar with a little band called the Arrogant Worms... IIRC they're from Saskatchewan... they did a cute little ditty about a disillusioned Mountie...
no subject
Date: 2007-11-29 08:28 pm (UTC)Also enjoyed, in no particular order; I'd imagine you'd know at least some of them:
Todd Butler (whose utterly savage "Beautiful BC" I sang at a karaoke fest in Beijing last trip there, to the general non-comprehension of the Chinese, thanks be)
Three Wierd Sisters
Emerald Rose
Swamparella
kd lang
and of course the late, lamented Stan Rogers. Garnet Rogers comes close...
no subject
Date: 2007-11-29 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-29 08:54 pm (UTC)Don't know if you ever found your way to the farmstead in Lumpkin or not: it was a bit east and then north of the Teletubbies Tower, which is quite the local landmark. Last I heard, they finally tore the old house down; I have delightful memories of staggering-good dalliances there, anyway. I'm never one to turn down a flower-fight when I'm in a sociable mood. Running away nekkid at three in the morning to go get sluiced off in the mist-covered pond was just simply a bonus.
And k.d. , well, there's another excuse for a bottle of raki some day... she was one very wierd kid, indeed.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-29 02:57 pm (UTC)Very, very depressing, but it kinda answers your question, doesn't it?
As I've said for several years now, it's sometimes hard to believe the Dems are much of an improvement.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-29 06:33 pm (UTC)That said, I had not seen that. Thanks, for some value of, "...for the added disgust." But it's good to know.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-29 07:17 pm (UTC)I'm married to one of those. She gets these tiny-typed newsprint leaflets in the mail every month, full of utterly incomprehensible manifestos from folks living in cold-water flats in the Bronx, or out in the 'burbs.
So, having just read that P-I article, fair question is this: what, if anything, is a reasonable political choice to make when the Reps and Dems seem to be batting off the same play-book? I know it's not the Greens, unless you like being on the no-fly list? But are there any other options that have more than a regional weight, if that?
Up here, we're sort of screwed in the viable opposition department too, but at least (thank God) we do have a minority government, which is the best possible state of affairs in a parliamentary country. Besides which, being in power makes the Neo-Cons get cocky, and that's fun to watch.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-29 07:32 pm (UTC)BTW, I figured you guys would've called an election by now, what happened? Torys too chicken, but not stupid enough to do something to provoke a no-confidence?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-29 09:06 pm (UTC)Sounds wierd, maybe, but it works.
Tories are just plain DUMB in my opinion. DUMB and DUMBER when you consider Harper and McKay (the little ratfink) together. But, well, they're OUR Tories, so we keep 'em around so that the children can see them in a quasi-natural setting.
[ETA: I'm feeling vaguely guilty about hijacking someone else's comment-space. How's all of this on netiquette, anyway?]
no subject
Date: 2007-11-29 09:22 pm (UTC)an attention whorefine with it, feel free to carry on.no subject
Date: 2007-11-29 09:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-29 09:24 pm (UTC)Does your @lj email work? (Mine doesn't, too much spam...)
no subject
Date: 2007-11-29 09:41 pm (UTC)I have the LJ-mail facility switched off. In theory I have an admin account at IAIR but have not figured out what to do with it (let alone figuring out quite what to do with IAIR, for which the Regents are starting to gripe at me).
In any event, I think my currently-best attributes are "skittish, but goes well with cinnamon sauce."
no subject
Date: 2007-11-30 04:12 am (UTC)I don't care who would get the votes. I wouldn't be pushing for people who do vote to vote differently; the only message would be aimed straight at people who don't vote. That's more than half the electorate. I'd specifically want the bored and disgusted to do it as a stunt.
Any result would send a shock through the system at this point, and would be an improvement.