Livejournal is hacking with the user profile page. The changes are, in my opinion, universally awful. Look at your own userinfo page, then add
Things I hate: The two-column layout. The pronounced tendency to horizontal scrollbars. The nasty myspace feel. The priourity it gives to "friends" over "biography" - you know, the thing the user actually writes. The fact that it puts the most useful information in the right hand column, the column where sites often put ads, and which is also the column many web readers have learned to block out. Advertisers call this "right hand blindness," and that's where they've put things I care about in the profile. The accidental nasty whitespace that appears in the middle of the second column (of three, in dystopia) if you put anything of any length in your bio. The fact that it lists the last school in your school list as your current school, which is just wrong. The bad wrapping control in the top box, the one that replaces the neat and tidy (and small) icon strip currently used.
Comments on the lj_design thread that I've read so far have been overwhelmingly very negative, but supposedly the comments from the support team were less than overwhelmingly thrilling, but they've gone ahead and referred to that feedback as being "positive feedback" and are so far pushing ahead with the new look. I think it's awful and suggest people here who have LJ accounts and opinions leave your own feedback on the thread I linked to above.
[ETA: None of this is to imply that I think the current userinfo page is good. It's not, particularly. But the new version is significantly worse for anyone who writes a bio or does any manipulation on their userinfo/profile page. For people who don't, the new look is... well, still lame, but not nearly as bad for them as for us.]
?ver=ngto the end of the URL to see the "new look." Here's what mine looks like in "new look" form.
Things I hate: The two-column layout. The pronounced tendency to horizontal scrollbars. The nasty myspace feel. The priourity it gives to "friends" over "biography" - you know, the thing the user actually writes. The fact that it puts the most useful information in the right hand column, the column where sites often put ads, and which is also the column many web readers have learned to block out. Advertisers call this "right hand blindness," and that's where they've put things I care about in the profile. The accidental nasty whitespace that appears in the middle of the second column (of three, in dystopia) if you put anything of any length in your bio. The fact that it lists the last school in your school list as your current school, which is just wrong. The bad wrapping control in the top box, the one that replaces the neat and tidy (and small) icon strip currently used.
Comments on the lj_design thread that I've read so far have been overwhelmingly very negative, but supposedly the comments from the support team were less than overwhelmingly thrilling, but they've gone ahead and referred to that feedback as being "positive feedback" and are so far pushing ahead with the new look. I think it's awful and suggest people here who have LJ accounts and opinions leave your own feedback on the thread I linked to above.
[ETA: None of this is to imply that I think the current userinfo page is good. It's not, particularly. But the new version is significantly worse for anyone who writes a bio or does any manipulation on their userinfo/profile page. For people who don't, the new look is... well, still lame, but not nearly as bad for them as for us.]
no subject
Date: 2006-06-17 06:05 am (UTC)Gotta go complain!
no subject
Date: 2006-06-17 06:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-17 06:33 am (UTC)And don't be abusive, I'm not calling jihad. I think they're on the verge of making a big mistake, though, and I want that avoided.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-17 07:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-17 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-17 06:30 am (UTC)Ye gods. Call Google already and get it over with.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-17 06:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-17 06:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-17 06:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-17 07:15 am (UTC)This has so many things wrong with it I can only believe that they designed it by committee.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-17 07:32 am (UTC)"New look" userinfo pages, in xCalibur, without ads, click here.
"New look" userinfo pages, in xCalibur, with ads, click here.
It's all about ad positioning in the areas they think most Sponsoured+ accounts are going to be using.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-17 07:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-17 08:59 am (UTC)I've contemplated moving to GreatestJournal as it was, this has made my decision a no-brainer.
Incidentally; I'm using Dystopia too and I can only see two columns...
no subject
Date: 2006-06-17 03:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-17 03:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-17 01:25 pm (UTC)As for the schools, you have no date range in it. That's probably why it shows up. I have dates for all of mine and none of them show at the top.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-17 03:58 pm (UTC)Also, it really irritates me that they can't even get a consistent column head across two columns. At least, not in Dystopia.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-19 12:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-19 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-19 12:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-19 04:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-17 02:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-17 03:53 pm (UTC)Man, the testing matrix on this must have been miniscule.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-17 03:42 pm (UTC)Hey... would you be willing to offer a quick critique of a web design I'm putting together? You seem to have great intuition about what works and what doesn't, and just as importantly, why. Lemme know.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-17 03:59 pm (UTC)(It's partly intuition, but it's probably partly also my art degree.)
no subject
Date: 2006-06-17 04:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-17 06:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-18 02:24 am (UTC)Just take a look at mine (http://ysabel.livejournal.com/profile?ver=ng).
(Not that I'm saying I like it, mind you, but it might amuse you.)