That was fast
Jun. 12th, 2004 10:48 amGot mail back from the tech contact alias at the domain where the "this is interesting" LJ virus going around is hosted. To quote the reply:
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 13:34:53 -0400
From: "Rev. Jeffrey Paul" <sneak@datavibe.net>
Subject: Re: Probable proof-of-concept for a simple spam robot
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 10:31:17AM -0700, Dara's Commercial Account wrote:
> It looks like one of your users is hosting a proof-of-concept
> Livejournal virus. When activated, it posts itself to the livejournal
> of the user who clicks on it. Users who click on it there (it's a
> social engineering virus) find it posted to their own journals. The
> user is collecting hit data via a webbug as well. It is clear to me
> that this is an attempt to build a spam robot targeting livejournal.
> Please delete this user's spam data before they can use it.
Yeah, that's mine.
If it's clear to you that it's an attempt at a spambot, then please go and
drink bleach.
Thank you, drive through.
-j
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Rev. Jeffrey Paul -datavibe- sneak@datavibe.net
aim:x736e65616b pgp:0x15FA257E phone:8777483467
70E0 B896 D5F3 8BF4 4BEE 2CCF EF2F BA28 15FA 257E
--------------------------------------------------------
no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 10:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 11:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 11:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 12:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-13 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 02:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 03:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 04:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-13 08:26 am (UTC)http://sneak.datavibe.net/blog/
Has several entries about it...including people congratulating the twit.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-13 11:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-14 07:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-14 08:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-14 09:16 am (UTC)The problem with doing the community spam is that you'd need to do at least two HTTP operations - the "fetch friends list", a parser and then a form.submit. I don't think you can actually do both simultaneously but I wouldn't bet on it.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-14 09:43 am (UTC)Regardless, in the lamest case, you have something that's one line of code away from being a lame but effective-the-first-time spambot that propogates itself pretty effectively, or did this time. So that's why I came to the conclusion that I did; whether he meant it to be such or not, it is a proof-of-concept for a distributed spam engine. La.