COWARDS, LIARS, AND FOOLS
Jan. 22nd, 2004 10:18 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
solarbirdSurprising no one but nonetheless engendering contempt all around, the AFA decides not to submit its poll results to Congress after all.
http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,61982,00.html
Gay Marriage Poll Gets Annulled
By Daniel Terdiman
When the American Family Association posted an online poll last month asking its constituents their position on gay marriage, it thought it was engaging in a straightforward exercise.
The conservative organization supports a constitutional amendment defining marriage as strictly between a man and a woman, and it planned to forward to Congress the results of the poll, which it expected would support its position, as evidence of Americans' opposition to gay marriage.
But the AFA never counted on the power of the Internet. And once the URL to the poll escaped its intended audience, everything went haywire. As of Jan. 19, 60 percent of respondents -- more than 508,000 voters -- said, "I favor legalization of homosexual marriage." With an additional 7.89 percent -- or 66,732 voters -- replying, "I favor a 'civil union' with the full benefits of marriage except for the name," the AFA's chosen position, "I oppose legalization of homosexual marriage and 'civil unions,'" was being defeated by a 2-1 ratio.
"We're very concerned that the traditional state of marriage is under threat in our country by homosexual activists," said AFA representative Buddy Smith. "It just so happens that homosexual activist groups around the country got a hold of the poll -- it was forwarded to them -- and they decided to have a little fun, and turn their organizations around the country (onto) the poll to try to cause it to represent something other than what we wanted it to. And so far, they succeeded with that."
Of course, no such poll can be said to represent an accurate picture of popular opinion. But, clearly, the AFA had hoped Congress would take the numbers it planned to produce as exactly that kind of evidence.
Now, Smith says, his organization has had to abandon its goal of taking the poll to Capitol Hill.
"We made the decision early on not to do that," Smith admitted, "because of how, as I say, the homosexual activists around the country have done their number on it."
http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,61982,00.html
Gay Marriage Poll Gets Annulled
By Daniel Terdiman
When the American Family Association posted an online poll last month asking its constituents their position on gay marriage, it thought it was engaging in a straightforward exercise.
The conservative organization supports a constitutional amendment defining marriage as strictly between a man and a woman, and it planned to forward to Congress the results of the poll, which it expected would support its position, as evidence of Americans' opposition to gay marriage.
But the AFA never counted on the power of the Internet. And once the URL to the poll escaped its intended audience, everything went haywire. As of Jan. 19, 60 percent of respondents -- more than 508,000 voters -- said, "I favor legalization of homosexual marriage." With an additional 7.89 percent -- or 66,732 voters -- replying, "I favor a 'civil union' with the full benefits of marriage except for the name," the AFA's chosen position, "I oppose legalization of homosexual marriage and 'civil unions,'" was being defeated by a 2-1 ratio.
"We're very concerned that the traditional state of marriage is under threat in our country by homosexual activists," said AFA representative Buddy Smith. "It just so happens that homosexual activist groups around the country got a hold of the poll -- it was forwarded to them -- and they decided to have a little fun, and turn their organizations around the country (onto) the poll to try to cause it to represent something other than what we wanted it to. And so far, they succeeded with that."
Of course, no such poll can be said to represent an accurate picture of popular opinion. But, clearly, the AFA had hoped Congress would take the numbers it planned to produce as exactly that kind of evidence.
Now, Smith says, his organization has had to abandon its goal of taking the poll to Capitol Hill.
"We made the decision early on not to do that," Smith admitted, "because of how, as I say, the homosexual activists around the country have done their number on it."
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-01-22 10:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-22 11:54 am (UTC):P
Because that's exactly what those poll results are worth, no matter which way they swing. IT'S AN INTERNET POLL, FOLKS! Yeesh....
*surprised to find herself a "homosexual activist"*
I never knew ... :D
no subject
Date: 2004-01-22 02:05 pm (UTC)It's kind of amusing - they intended to get votes from their own interest group, presumably circulated the URL among that, but ended up finding the URL circulated elsewhere... hoist by your own petard, as they say.
So overall, a pretty funny result but utterly worthless either way, like all Internet polls (well, that people might care about enough to organise a campaign for, anyhow).
no subject
Date: 2004-01-22 01:21 pm (UTC)Post Poll.
Realize Poll isn't going the way we want it to.
Change rules to eliminate a bunch of "wrong" answers (checking for valid email address)
Realize that the rule change didn't change the results enough.
Try to think of another rule change to retroactivly apply.
Fail.
Decide that you have been outwitted by a minority instead of believeing your own results.
Take your ball and go home.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-22 05:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-22 09:29 pm (UTC)