DC is the Court at Versailles:
"Under Bush, some people are imprisoned forever without due process of law while others who receive due process of law and are found guilty are set free. Do I have that right?" - a commenter on TPM.
Yes, you have that right. And these discrepancies often happen in a monarchy where the elite is above the law and decide, based on their own interests, who is and is not subject to the criminal justice system. Paris Hilton did more time than Scooter Libby.--Andrew Sullivan
And the DC press corps is as useless and enabling as the fawning nobles seeking Kingly favour in pre-revolutionary France:
And over the last six years, that "principle" has been extended to its most extreme though logical conclusions. This administration expressly adopted theories -- right out in the open -- which, as it its central premise, states that the President is greater than the law, that his "obligation" to protect the nation means that nothing and nobody can limit what he does, including -- especially -- the laws enacted by our Congress, no matter how radical and extreme that conduct is.
In response to this most audacious declaration of Presidential Omnipotence, our Sober Guardians of Political Wisdom shrugged. Those who objected too strenuously, who used terms such as "criminal" and "lawlessness" or who raised the specter of impeachment -- the tool created by the Founders to redress executive lawbreaking -- were branded as radicals or impetuous, unserious partisan hysterics. The only crime recognized by official Washington is using impetuous or excessively irreverent language to object to the lawbreaking and radicalism of the Leader, or acting too aggressively to investigate it. That is the only crime that triggers their outrage.--Glenn Greenwald
I don't even care about the pardon itself. (And before anybody says it: no, it wasn't illegal. Wrong, but not illegal. I particularly like how commuting the sentence rather than issuing a complete pardon allows Mr. Libby to know he's not going to jail, yet
preserves his ability to protect the administration himself by taking the 5th. Plus, by specifically not ruling out a later pardon, Mr. Bush is telling Mr. Libby to relax; it doesn't matter what the courts do.) I care about the raw accumulation of lawless power. I care about the ending of habeas corpus - the ability to seize anyone, at any time, and hold them forever. I care about the
overtly illegal domestic spying and the
overt overruling of Congressional law, on a massive scale, by the Executive branch. I care about the raw use of raw torture. I care about the invention of new branches of government responsible to
no one at all. And I care very, very much that somehow, all the defenders of this insanity, so many of the people who screamed RULE OF LAW! RULE OF LAW! about former President Clinton, are apparently somehow convinced that this is just fine now, because it's done by one of theirs. And I am made breathless by the sheer stupidity of the apparent idea that none of their political opponents will use this lawless, unchecked power in ways they don't like, ever.
I mean, I just want to slap these people. Do they think President Hillary Clinton would undo this damage? How about President Rudy Guliani? President Fred Thompson? Anyone? If you're reading this and you do, you are
out of your fucking mind. Impeachment is only the beginning of the solution, not the end of it. The Democrats are thus far showing (yet again) that they are certainly not up to it; so at least two new parties are apparently needed. The Press Corps are degenerate in their worthlessness, so new
media are, apparently, also needed, and bloggers - though useful - are not enough. And, as much as anything, it must be realised that the DC establishment - the Beltway Class - has made
itself irrelevant except as a cheerleader for power for its own sake, and as a defender of its own, separate, political class interests. Their commentaries are worthless, and those elected to power must be told what these voices are and that they should be
ignored.
[White House Press Spokesman Tony] Snow was asked by a reporter if anyone in the administration would ever apologize for what prompted the entire investigation - public disclosure that Valerie Plame, the wife of sharp anti-war critic Joseph Wilson, was an undercover CIA officer.
"Yeah, it's improper to be leaking those names," Snow said. Pressed on whether someone in the administration owed the American public an apology, Snow said, "I'll apologize. Done."-- reported by The Guardian
Mmmm, naked contempt.
ETA: Click through to the comments;
risu makes an interesting point that I think is valid about the political situation this commutation reveals.