Today's Cultural Warfare Update, Part I
Mar. 23rd, 2007 05:51 pmThat's kind of neat; Focus on the Family is slowly shifting to outright opposition to the HPV vaccine that prevents cervical cancer. They aren't there yet, but they're working on it, backing a bill to block Federal funds to schools who include it in their standard vaccinations package, and shifting their coverage of any HPV issue to negative. The other theocon groups are drifting similarly. You'll see that in Parts II and III.
And now, today's news.
Obscenely misleading headline on CNN.COM says "Biology teacher fired for referring to Bible;" no, he was fired for teaching Creationism in direct violation of school policy, and linked evolution to Planned Parenthood and Naziism;
German judge relies on Koran to deny a woman suffering severe beatings by her husband a divorce; there appropriate outrage;
German judge removed from bench over ruling;
ACT-UP founder Larry Kramer's column asking straight people: why do you hate us so much? In particular, he takes GBLT people to task for voting on the basis of lesser hate vs. greater hate;
Andrew Sullivan links to a radio excerpt of a Concerned Women for America wonk's explosive interaction with Mitt Romney;
Faith and Freedom Network praises Indianapolis Colts coach Tony Dungy for speaking at the anti-gay Illinois Family Institute lunch and awards ceremony. They (hysterically) try to claim that the IFI isn't a political organisation and that this is therefore religious intolerance. Now that's comedy. On a more serious note, this is just another manifestation of their underlying position: if you don't let them control your life through their laws, you are religiously oppressing them, because their rights include control over you, in the name of Jehovah;
A second FFN article praising Tony Dungy, who says, "I'm with God and I believe IFI has taken the biblical, Godly position on marriage and so I'm pleased to stand with it";
Faith and Freedom Network asks whether Americans have too much freedom; the poll they have up with it outright asks whether Americans have too much freedom of expression, and answers it by saying only if Americans fail to "embrace the Judeo-Christian principles that made America great." He also quotes quite a bit about how democracy is only a good form of government for Christians and that liberty shouldn't be "a cloak for vice" and so on. As of this writing, the completely unscientific poll about whether Americans have too much freedom of expression is split, 51:49 against. I note for comparison purposes that the self-selected polls normally run 11:1 or so in favour of the FFN position;
FFN opposes bill to instigate a state investigation of anti-abortion "pregnancy resource centres" in Oregon;
From
cubes, an update on the Largo, Florida case of a city going against its own city policy to fire their city manager because of her gender reassignment;
Faith and Freedom Network condemns the Soulforce religiously-based pro-GBLT activist group as "a sad commentary" and "a missed opportunity," presumably, to try to turn more queers str8;
FFN praises General Pace for (against policy, in uniform) condemning lesbian and gay soldiers as immoral, and praises commentary (same interview, but prefixed with "as an individual") that he's glad that, in the military, "we prosecute that kind of immoral behavior";
Focus on the Family has a story unhappy about the overturning of COPA ("Child Online Protection Act") as overreaching; this is the story with the Colbertian "Families in DANGER" graphic;
Focus on the Family ACTION ITEM against including GBLT people in violent hate-crimes law, and claims it "would make opposition to homosexuality a crime"; I suppose that's true if you consider beatings to be "opposition to homosexuality" that shouldn't, you know, be criminal; I did certainly hear enough in the past from fundamentalist groups such as Concerned Women for America defending gaybashing as a normal and natural response to the perversion of homosexuality;
Focus on the Family supports South Carolina bill requiring doctors offer ultrasounds to women considering abortions;
Alliance Defense Fund sues school over not allowing an anti-gay T-shirt on campus; it's one of several such lawsuits;
Focus on the Family is moving towards more open opposition to the HPV (cervical cancer) vaccine, slowly; they've started taking the "emphasise anything negative about it" approach they take to anything they dislike. In this case, they raise the entirely legitimate point that it hasn't been tested on children under 15 - but it always goes back around to 'but it's an STD andthe little whores unmarried people shouldn't be having sex anyway.' I really find that deeply repulsive - and kind of indicative about where they'd go, if they could;
"Touchdown MARRIAGE" - Focus on the Family likes Indianapolis Colts coach Tony Dungy's anti-gay stance. Even better, they actually make the bizarre claim that Coach Dungy's anti-gay activities and Christian activism should make any queer players on the team feel better about working for him, not worse;
Focus on the Family applauds new Utah law allowing schools to bar clubs "found to be offensive" by the community. The bill's author, Utah State Senator Chris Buttars (R-West Jordan), was overtly targeting Gay-Straight Alliance clubs, and is pleased to have helped pass a law letting schools ban them. Note that they started appearing only after a Supreme Court ruling requiring equal access was won in response to fundamentalists demanding religious clubs be allowed to use school property, and that GSA clubs made it into schools on the basis of that ruling. Again: oppression under the law is the goal, and we see it overtly again here. Also, a quick Google search shows that Senator Buttars shows up a lot in creationism and anti-gay activity;
Focus on the Family condemns fertility clinics offering surrogate services to gay male couples;
Focus on the Family lurvs them some Tom Delay, and runs his condemnation of "the politics of personal destruction" on the very same page he calls liberals a pack of Communist thugs; this is mostly interesting because you get a glimpse into James Dobson's lobbying within the party - Delay slams Dick Armey for not being responsive enough to James Dobson's agenda. This entry includes both Part I and Part II of the interview, the latter of which only came out today. The latter part is headlined, "The Lord Has Had a Major Part in Developing Who Tom DeLay Is";
Focus on the Family backs a Federal effort by US Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-GA) to deny Federal funds to any school including the HPV/cervical cancer vaccine in their standard vaccinations package;
FotF ACTION ITEM against DP benefits in New Mexico;
Focus on the Family Brazil very unhappy with proposed anti-discrimination law, says it's against their religion not to be able to fire queers;
Focus on the Family USA interviews the head of Focus on the Family Latin America;
FotF makes a weird claim that Jamestown Settlement and Museum is being purged of Christianity-related materials;
FotF alarmed that Mexico City is considering legalising first-trimster abortions;
FotF outraged at "gay indoctrination" at Chicago high schools; anybody know what this is actually about? It looks like one of those things wherein here's a whole bunch of stuff going on and one of the things going on is GBLT students speaking about their own experiences. Focus hates that because one of their man methodologies is keeping GBLT people from being seen as people;
FotF ACTION ITEM against embryonic stem cell research;
Student who joined with ADF to sue her teacher and school over not getting to write a religious paper in a psychology class finally got a grade;
FotF claims a link between abortion and child abuse; anybody heard of the Internet Journal of Pediatrics and Neonatology? Is it real or another sham? Given that they have the word "internet" in their name and gave an interview to LifeNews, I tend to suspect the latter, but am withholding judgement. The study, by the way, was a study of low-income women with a pre-existing history of child abuse;
FotF: "Pope Says Catholic Lawmakers Cannot Compromise";
FotF supports anti-gay remarks made by General Pace; given the similarities between this story and the Faith and Freedom Network version, I rather suspect that FFN sourced theirs from this one;
FotF: Newt Gingrich calls for abolishing the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, saying it doesn't belong in America;
FotF condemns New York State Supreme Court ruling upholding recognition of an out-of-state same-sex marriage. Alliance Defense Fund counsel Brian Raum predicts the court's decision will be overturned, leading one to wonder by whom, exactly? But presumably they expect some sort of Federal intervention;
FotF notes that "[Episcopalian] Denomination refuses to back down from support of homosexuality" and talks up a schism;
FotF reports that the Marriage and Family Institute - a local group that has an anti-marriage wing, and secular and religious forks - will continue receiving Federal funds for its nominally secular portion, a legal challenge having failed.
( Articles and excerpts below )
And now, today's news.
Obscenely misleading headline on CNN.COM says "Biology teacher fired for referring to Bible;" no, he was fired for teaching Creationism in direct violation of school policy, and linked evolution to Planned Parenthood and Naziism;
German judge relies on Koran to deny a woman suffering severe beatings by her husband a divorce; there appropriate outrage;
German judge removed from bench over ruling;
ACT-UP founder Larry Kramer's column asking straight people: why do you hate us so much? In particular, he takes GBLT people to task for voting on the basis of lesser hate vs. greater hate;
Andrew Sullivan links to a radio excerpt of a Concerned Women for America wonk's explosive interaction with Mitt Romney;
Faith and Freedom Network praises Indianapolis Colts coach Tony Dungy for speaking at the anti-gay Illinois Family Institute lunch and awards ceremony. They (hysterically) try to claim that the IFI isn't a political organisation and that this is therefore religious intolerance. Now that's comedy. On a more serious note, this is just another manifestation of their underlying position: if you don't let them control your life through their laws, you are religiously oppressing them, because their rights include control over you, in the name of Jehovah;
A second FFN article praising Tony Dungy, who says, "I'm with God and I believe IFI has taken the biblical, Godly position on marriage and so I'm pleased to stand with it";
Faith and Freedom Network asks whether Americans have too much freedom; the poll they have up with it outright asks whether Americans have too much freedom of expression, and answers it by saying only if Americans fail to "embrace the Judeo-Christian principles that made America great." He also quotes quite a bit about how democracy is only a good form of government for Christians and that liberty shouldn't be "a cloak for vice" and so on. As of this writing, the completely unscientific poll about whether Americans have too much freedom of expression is split, 51:49 against. I note for comparison purposes that the self-selected polls normally run 11:1 or so in favour of the FFN position;
FFN opposes bill to instigate a state investigation of anti-abortion "pregnancy resource centres" in Oregon;
From
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Faith and Freedom Network condemns the Soulforce religiously-based pro-GBLT activist group as "a sad commentary" and "a missed opportunity," presumably, to try to turn more queers str8;
FFN praises General Pace for (against policy, in uniform) condemning lesbian and gay soldiers as immoral, and praises commentary (same interview, but prefixed with "as an individual") that he's glad that, in the military, "we prosecute that kind of immoral behavior";
Focus on the Family has a story unhappy about the overturning of COPA ("Child Online Protection Act") as overreaching; this is the story with the Colbertian "Families in DANGER" graphic;
Focus on the Family ACTION ITEM against including GBLT people in violent hate-crimes law, and claims it "would make opposition to homosexuality a crime"; I suppose that's true if you consider beatings to be "opposition to homosexuality" that shouldn't, you know, be criminal; I did certainly hear enough in the past from fundamentalist groups such as Concerned Women for America defending gaybashing as a normal and natural response to the perversion of homosexuality;
Focus on the Family supports South Carolina bill requiring doctors offer ultrasounds to women considering abortions;
Alliance Defense Fund sues school over not allowing an anti-gay T-shirt on campus; it's one of several such lawsuits;
Focus on the Family is moving towards more open opposition to the HPV (cervical cancer) vaccine, slowly; they've started taking the "emphasise anything negative about it" approach they take to anything they dislike. In this case, they raise the entirely legitimate point that it hasn't been tested on children under 15 - but it always goes back around to 'but it's an STD and
"Touchdown MARRIAGE" - Focus on the Family likes Indianapolis Colts coach Tony Dungy's anti-gay stance. Even better, they actually make the bizarre claim that Coach Dungy's anti-gay activities and Christian activism should make any queer players on the team feel better about working for him, not worse;
Focus on the Family applauds new Utah law allowing schools to bar clubs "found to be offensive" by the community. The bill's author, Utah State Senator Chris Buttars (R-West Jordan), was overtly targeting Gay-Straight Alliance clubs, and is pleased to have helped pass a law letting schools ban them. Note that they started appearing only after a Supreme Court ruling requiring equal access was won in response to fundamentalists demanding religious clubs be allowed to use school property, and that GSA clubs made it into schools on the basis of that ruling. Again: oppression under the law is the goal, and we see it overtly again here. Also, a quick Google search shows that Senator Buttars shows up a lot in creationism and anti-gay activity;
Focus on the Family condemns fertility clinics offering surrogate services to gay male couples;
Focus on the Family lurvs them some Tom Delay, and runs his condemnation of "the politics of personal destruction" on the very same page he calls liberals a pack of Communist thugs; this is mostly interesting because you get a glimpse into James Dobson's lobbying within the party - Delay slams Dick Armey for not being responsive enough to James Dobson's agenda. This entry includes both Part I and Part II of the interview, the latter of which only came out today. The latter part is headlined, "The Lord Has Had a Major Part in Developing Who Tom DeLay Is";
Focus on the Family backs a Federal effort by US Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-GA) to deny Federal funds to any school including the HPV/cervical cancer vaccine in their standard vaccinations package;
FotF ACTION ITEM against DP benefits in New Mexico;
Focus on the Family Brazil very unhappy with proposed anti-discrimination law, says it's against their religion not to be able to fire queers;
Focus on the Family USA interviews the head of Focus on the Family Latin America;
FotF makes a weird claim that Jamestown Settlement and Museum is being purged of Christianity-related materials;
FotF alarmed that Mexico City is considering legalising first-trimster abortions;
FotF outraged at "gay indoctrination" at Chicago high schools; anybody know what this is actually about? It looks like one of those things wherein here's a whole bunch of stuff going on and one of the things going on is GBLT students speaking about their own experiences. Focus hates that because one of their man methodologies is keeping GBLT people from being seen as people;
FotF ACTION ITEM against embryonic stem cell research;
Student who joined with ADF to sue her teacher and school over not getting to write a religious paper in a psychology class finally got a grade;
FotF claims a link between abortion and child abuse; anybody heard of the Internet Journal of Pediatrics and Neonatology? Is it real or another sham? Given that they have the word "internet" in their name and gave an interview to LifeNews, I tend to suspect the latter, but am withholding judgement. The study, by the way, was a study of low-income women with a pre-existing history of child abuse;
FotF: "Pope Says Catholic Lawmakers Cannot Compromise";
FotF supports anti-gay remarks made by General Pace; given the similarities between this story and the Faith and Freedom Network version, I rather suspect that FFN sourced theirs from this one;
FotF: Newt Gingrich calls for abolishing the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, saying it doesn't belong in America;
FotF condemns New York State Supreme Court ruling upholding recognition of an out-of-state same-sex marriage. Alliance Defense Fund counsel Brian Raum predicts the court's decision will be overturned, leading one to wonder by whom, exactly? But presumably they expect some sort of Federal intervention;
FotF notes that "[Episcopalian] Denomination refuses to back down from support of homosexuality" and talks up a schism;
FotF reports that the Marriage and Family Institute - a local group that has an anti-marriage wing, and secular and religious forks - will continue receiving Federal funds for its nominally secular portion, a legal challenge having failed.
( Articles and excerpts below )