It's all about the shrieking.
Sep. 17th, 2002 09:38 amThings are well and firmly pooched.
The new sendmail changes the format of sendmail.cf again. The new sendmail configuration tools are installed in a VERY, VERY BROKEN STATE and don't work. The package manager has decided that it has a holy obligation to remove all of:
apache at bind bug deliver info2www junkbuster logrotate man2html mgetty-fax mutt nmh nn phpmyadmin qpopper samba smartlist super swat task-dns-server task-samba trn www-pgsql xlbiff
...but I've managed to fix that. I've forced a (semi?) correct sendmail.cf together in the new data format, but now that it's running, sendmail can't see name service. Meanwhile, the package manager has also decided that libcurses-dev conflicts with itself, and by god is going to let me know about it constantly.
All of this started just in upgrading around a libc but that allows remote exploits. The dependancy tree for libc is {darth vader noise}impressive{/darth vader noise}. And, apparently, severely fucked.
stupid package managers. i hate this really a lot.
The new sendmail changes the format of sendmail.cf again. The new sendmail configuration tools are installed in a VERY, VERY BROKEN STATE and don't work. The package manager has decided that it has a holy obligation to remove all of:
apache at bind bug deliver info2www junkbuster logrotate man2html mgetty-fax mutt nmh nn phpmyadmin qpopper samba smartlist super swat task-dns-server task-samba trn www-pgsql xlbiff
...but I've managed to fix that. I've forced a (semi?) correct sendmail.cf together in the new data format, but now that it's running, sendmail can't see name service. Meanwhile, the package manager has also decided that libcurses-dev conflicts with itself, and by god is going to let me know about it constantly.
All of this started just in upgrading around a libc but that allows remote exploits. The dependancy tree for libc is {darth vader noise}impressive{/darth vader noise}. And, apparently, severely fucked.
stupid package managers. i hate this really a lot.
no subject
Date: 2002-09-17 01:54 pm (UTC)no subject
no subject
Date: 2002-09-17 04:31 pm (UTC)Of course, this is also why I still don't have X running three months after getting a new computer with a video card that's only supported by a later version of XFree86 since #9 went out of business, and of course that later version of XFree86 only supports libc6, and until recently the core system utilities were linked against libc4. I persist in maintaining the only running instance of the Sfonk distribution, but I wouldn't wish it on anyone.
no subject
Date: 2002-09-17 04:39 pm (UTC)I'd be tempted to go to FreeBSD or something, but that wouldn't solve the sendmail problems. (FreeBSD+exim might, but there are reasons we didn't switch to exim when we moved from slackware to Debian...)
Anyway, it's all working now. I think.