solarbird: (yokohama)
[personal profile] solarbird
Okay, for those who don't know, doing original research science also means means doing literature searches. At first this is informative, but after a couple of weeks, I gotta tell you, every fucking paper you read looks exactly like this.

Exactly.

(Also, please enjoy the presentation.)

Date: 2010-03-09 06:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elfs.livejournal.com
You ain't just whistlin' Dixie.

Date: 2010-03-09 06:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sistawendy.livejournal.com
I'm laying a square egg.

Actually, they started looking like that to me in much less than two weeks.

Date: 2010-03-09 07:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lyonesse.livejournal.com
oh, not at all. from figure 1 it is brutally clear that they're trying to use a db model, and therefore the paper is ALL KINDS OF WR0GN.

Date: 2010-03-09 07:03 am (UTC)

Date: 2010-03-09 07:53 am (UTC)
ext_3294: Tux (foggy)
From: [identity profile] technoshaman.livejournal.com
Gives, ah say, gives a whole new meaning to "chicken scratching" :)
Edited Date: 2010-03-09 07:53 am (UTC)

Date: 2010-03-09 08:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com
My ex-housemate who lived with me through my thesis crazy bought me a t-shirt from Texts From Last Night (http://www.textsfromlastnight.com/Text-Replies-7669.html) with this on it:

(215): yeah seriously, fuck school. I'm changing my master's thesis question from "what are the neuropsychological correlates of antisocial personality" to "will my cat drink this beer"

Date: 2010-03-09 09:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] foibos.livejournal.com
I saved this under a non-descript name (not Mr. Sanders) in a crowded directory. Hopefully, when I see it again, I will have forgotten about it and open it to see what it's about.

Date: 2010-03-09 11:13 am (UTC)
maellenkleth: (consultant)
From: [personal profile] maellenkleth
Jeez, can I ever identify right now.

His would-be co-author (who dropped out) was a real turkey, though.

Date: 2010-03-09 03:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jonathankorman.livejournal.com
See, now you made me look up my favourite scientific paper, on electron band structure in Germanium. (http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~kovar/hall.html)

Date: 2010-03-09 04:53 pm (UTC)
kodi: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kodi
It's so ridiculously difficult to share this comic. It's from The Parking Lot is Full, published March 15, 1996, copyright Jack McLaren and Pat Spacek, but there's no way to link directly to the image where it is legitimately hosted. Anyway, it's thematically very closely related to the paper in question.

Date: 2010-03-09 04:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stickmaker.livejournal.com


You get the same effect with technical abstracts and software manuals. Just a different word. For each. In fact, you could write a dissertation on what word each type of boring document brings to mind. :-)

Date: 2010-03-09 05:31 pm (UTC)

Date: 2010-03-09 09:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anna-copperowl.livejournal.com
Yes.

I am contracting at an organization that (among other things) publishes peer-reviewed papers on quite esoteric scientific subjects. I should slip that paper into my mix of test data. I wonder if anyone would notice? Most of my current test data involves cats. Really. Did I mention these fine folks think I'm half-a-bubble off level?

Date: 2010-03-09 10:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] foibos.livejournal.com
Oh! Was it the Col. Sanders allusion? Because I didn't even think of that.

I'm not funny or anything, just confused.

Date: 2010-03-10 09:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oh6.livejournal.com
I guess I don't read enough technical documents. Or perhaps man pages don't really qualify.

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    1 23
4 56 7 8 910
1112 131415 1617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags