Date: 2008-01-16 11:48 pm (UTC)
Sheesh. Just raising the question that something seems odd, and doing statistical analyses (which, BTW, if you don't have the statistics training to figure out yourself, you don't have the statistics training to classify as half-assed), is not libel, sleazy, or swiftboating. Did you read the original articles? Generally everyone, solarbird included, is saying "we don't know what this means." Hell, the one voter fraud claim I've seen is the speculation that the Repubs did it on purpose to make Clinton look bad--nobody I have seen has claimed that Clinton did it. Yeah, there might well be another confounding variable, but knowledgeable people keep pointing out possible ones, they redo the analyses, and the results continue to be anomalous. NOT evidence of fraud, but anomalous.

Cathy
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 234 5 67
891011 1213 14
15 16 17181920 21
2223 2425 26 2728
29 30     

Most Popular Tags