Links
Active Entries
- 1: sometimes, I think of ponies
- 2: Careless People
- 3: let’s all go to the EXIT
- 4: alt text issues
- 5: the delicate art of text replacement
- 6: thinking about someone I should not bother thinking about
- 7: the media may not care, but ICE is still running roughshod over LA this July 4th
- 8: Call your Republican Senators RIGHT NOW.
- 9: Yes, establishment Democrats of New York, “vote blue no matter who” still applies
- 10: as a treat
no subject
Date: 2006-04-30 04:45 pm (UTC)For the life of me I cannot understand this utterly disproportionate interest/concern with what gays and lesbians are up to at any given moment. I can see making us maybe one or two "action items" but almost -all- of these? What the...?
Or maybe it's just that this is working so well to smokescreen all the other problems that "their" administration is having.
As far as the peer reviewed article being published, as I recall not too long ago there were a couple of students who created a paper that was absolutely incoherent made up of nothing but randomly chosen industry buzzwords and submitted it to hundreds of peer reviewed industry journals - and eleven published it. They then admitted that they hadn't actually -read- it but since the title was plausible and timely, they included it. Now I'm not saying that this is what happened with the Journal of Biosocial Science but I wouldn't be surprised if it were.