New kind of bird!
Dec. 9th, 2005 01:26 pmWhat the hell is this?

Unexpected Bird
Pale grey back, breast, neck; more neutral, paler, and less brown than it looks like in this picture. Dark charcoal grey (almost black, but not quite; darker than in this picture) wings, head, tail, but with pale grey strikes over the eyes and what seemed to be some pale grey spots at the tail. Along the back of the neck, a vertical dark charcoal-grey stripe. The beak was closer to a flicker, but it was smaller than any flicker I've seen. NO other colour. It looked a lot like taking a three-toed woodpecker and separating out all the black and white sections into solid areas, removing all hint of striping or spotting except just at the tail.
Oh, and since I'm posting again already, our neighbour's house at night is apparently, Ladies and Gentlemen:

The Great State of Kentucky

Only Slightly Less Like Kentucky

Unexpected Bird
Pale grey back, breast, neck; more neutral, paler, and less brown than it looks like in this picture. Dark charcoal grey (almost black, but not quite; darker than in this picture) wings, head, tail, but with pale grey strikes over the eyes and what seemed to be some pale grey spots at the tail. Along the back of the neck, a vertical dark charcoal-grey stripe. The beak was closer to a flicker, but it was smaller than any flicker I've seen. NO other colour. It looked a lot like taking a three-toed woodpecker and separating out all the black and white sections into solid areas, removing all hint of striping or spotting except just at the tail.
Oh, and since I'm posting again already, our neighbour's house at night is apparently, Ladies and Gentlemen:

The Great State of Kentucky

Only Slightly Less Like Kentucky
no subject
Date: 2005-12-09 09:34 pm (UTC)Too. Damn. Silly.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-09 09:41 pm (UTC)Bwhahahaha!
no subject
Date: 2005-12-09 09:42 pm (UTC)Kentucky is striking me as really, really funny.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-09 09:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-09 10:17 pm (UTC)About your struggle to see the background - my dad took a series of these pictures a year or two back and used them on his christmas cards - they were generally much less tasteful (and on much smaller houses). Anyhow, he wrote an article about how to photograph them so that you can get both the house and the lights. The basic tips were:
a) take the picture when there's still some daylight.
b) use flash (assuming you have a separate, powerful flash unit that will reach to the house)
I think he also suggested taking two shots exposed differently using a tripod and overlaying them after a lot of screwing around in photoshop, but that sounds like far too much work :)
no subject
Date: 2005-12-09 10:34 pm (UTC)Cathy
no subject
Date: 2005-12-10 02:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-10 06:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-10 06:34 am (UTC)In person, it didn't look like that, because eyes are better at handling the contrast than cameras are, and it looks like a house with a bunch of lights. Plus, you see in 3D, so you see that things that look flat in the picture are not flat in person, and so on.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-10 06:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-10 06:36 am (UTC)Just not always "ha ha" funny.
^_^
no subject
Date: 2005-12-10 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-11 08:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-11 05:48 pm (UTC)Downy Woodpecker on suet feeder (males have a red splash on the back of their heads, same with Hairy Woodpeckers):
http://www.flickr.com/photos/firni/1456183/in/set-378157/
Hairy Woodpecker on the same feeder:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/firni/1456249/in/set-378157/
I know it's hard to tell from the pictures, but Hairies also have longer beaks. The Downy guys have short little beaks. Once you figure out the size difference you'll be able to tell which one is on the feeder just by glancing out the window. Well, until breeding season, then it's "what the hell? is that a baby Hairy or a Downy?"
no subject
Date: 2005-12-11 09:55 pm (UTC)The second one wants me to sign in and I don't have a flickr account. (hee flickr)
no subject
Date: 2005-12-11 10:19 pm (UTC)Bird!
Date: 2005-12-12 12:20 am (UTC)-S.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-12 07:41 am (UTC)If it doesn't have red on the back of the head, then it's a female.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-12 07:42 am (UTC)Expensive, natch. I can't remember if I've seen that size anywhere else.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-13 12:40 am (UTC)