Now THAT is just absurd...

Date: 2004-10-24 06:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shikyrie.livejournal.com
Sounds more like an "I know you are, but what am I?" type of thing that little kids on the playground would pull... Frankly, I can't wait until next tuesday is over and done with... I had some "Christian" on a mailing list I belong to call me all sorts of nasty names because I stated that I support Kerry, and didn't want her anti-"anything-but-bush" propaganda littering my email box... also tired of republicans calling and cussing me out when I can't find Nowheresville's (any town will do here) Bush-Cheney HQ... So, KErry may not be perfect- big deal, but IMHO, he's the lesser of 2 evils...

Date: 2004-10-24 06:41 pm (UTC)
avram: (Default)
From: [personal profile] avram
That first article does not accurately convey just how far-out loony and dangerous the Christian Reconstructionist movement is. Y’know how you and I look at Jerry Falwell and think of him as a nutty extremist Christian? The Christian Reconstructionists are the people Falwell looks at and thinks of as nutty extremist Christians. Here’s the first paragraph of “Invitation to a Stoning” from Reason Online:
For connoisseurs of surrealism on the American right, it's hard to beat an exchange that appeared about a decade ago in the Heritage Foundation magazine Policy Review. It started when two associates of the Rev. Jerry Falwell wrote an article which criticized Christian Reconstructionism, the influential movement led by theologian Rousas John (R.J.) Rushdoony, for advocating positions that even they as committed fundamentalists found "scary." Among Reconstructionism's highlights, the article cited support for laws "mandating the death penalty for homosexuals and drunkards." The Rev. Rushdoony fired off a letter to the editor complaining that the article had got his followers' views all wrong: They didn't intend to put drunkards to death.

Date: 2004-10-24 07:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shikyrie.livejournal.com
it's extremists like those that give Christian's a bad name by painting anything that contradicts their way of belief as evil, etc.

Date: 2004-10-24 08:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] saphyre-blue.livejournal.com
That is the biggest crock of crap I have seen yet. I can not believe the garbage that has come out in this campaign. It really disgusts me.

Date: 2004-10-24 08:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sistawendy.livejournal.com
And the piece de resistance: [livejournal.com profile] wendy2032 is a Republican transsexual.

I won't be clicking those links. You've told me all I need to know.

Lesser of two(or more)evils-pick one.

Date: 2004-10-25 07:08 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
For almost a decade, I worked for a Chrisitian college-and, for the most part,they cringed at the stunts pulled by fundamentalists more than anyone else.Beware the verse quoter-they haven't read their own instruction manual.(FWIW,the names I've always heard for fundamentalist were "hardshell" and "Bible-thumper").For most of the Christians I spoke with there, they chose to "show by example" rather than ranting. There were a few ranters, but they were a small(but noisy)minority-less than five percent would be my guess,from my experiences there.
Maybe the reason there seems to be so many undecideds this election is that it really is a "pick the lesser of two evils.."(I want the T-Shirt I saw on U.K.'s campus last week "Vote Cthulhu-why pick the lesser of two evils?") Scott(who promises to try and take all this political stuff more seriously in the future).

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    1 23
4 56 7 8 910
1112 131415 1617
1819202122 2324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags