solarbird: (molly-sleepy-not-asleep)
solarbird ([personal profile] solarbird) wrote2010-03-16 11:27 pm
Entry tags:

a few items of interest

Daylight Savings time costs energy, not saves it, study says. Energy used for lighting is reduced, but it's overtaken by greater morning heating costs early on, and - new since World War II - air-conditioning costs during afternoons and such in summer. Might be time to re-evaluate this whole thing.

Octopus fossils are rarer than hens teeth, but a few really good ones were found recently.

Films from the End of an Empire - home movies from South Asia in the last years of the British Raj and the first years of independence.
maellenkleth: (lightweight-ship-xipan)

[personal profile] maellenkleth 2010-03-17 10:38 am (UTC)(link)
On that note, there is some chattering amongst the massenfolk up here, to the effect that permanent daylight savings time would be desirable. I am still trying to figure out who might actually be pushing that idea, and to what end. Cui bono?
ext_3038: Cropped photo of the ancient artwork "Apollo and the Raven", circa 480 B.C. (Apollo)

[identity profile] triadruid.livejournal.com 2010-03-17 02:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Boosting signal on the first link; I've always suspected that to be the case, and kudos to the scientists for taking advantage of a field experiment situation to test it.

[identity profile] 403.livejournal.com 2010-03-17 07:40 pm (UTC)(link)
WRT #1: That's why Arizona never did daylight savings. Summer air conditioning costs are ridiculous enough that if we really wanted to save energy, we'd go noctournal from April to November.

[identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com 2010-03-18 10:13 am (UTC)(link)
Say what you want about daylight savings, but I'll pass on the sun coming up at 4:30am in summer.