![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
I don't know what to think.
Good morning, Cascadia. Good afternoon, everyone else.
I have no idea what to think. The 1Q GDP report came in much worse than expected - down an annualised 6.1% rather than the 4.7% concensus (or 5.1% Marketwatch) expectations, and really quite bad, on the whole. But the market is jumping on a 2.2% rise in consumer spending in the report.
But I don't understand where "consumer spending rebounded to rise 2.2%" comes from given massive layoffs and massive increases in saving rates. Not to mention a 34.1% decline in imports (which tend to be consumer goods) and! a fall of 1% in prices! (Remember, that price deflation thing? You're soaking in it!) So it's not inflation, and it's not income, and it's not credit, and it's not imports, and it's certainly not manufacturing capacity (at record lows), it's not government spending (still down 1Q, and tax revenues are cratering - the sales tax numbers scream that this 2.2% number is bullshit) and sure, inventories are down - implying fire-sales - but not as much as expected. So where's the money coming from and what are they buying?
I mean, sure, I've been calling shenanigans on some government statistics for a while (c.f. how the savings rate across a two year period magically got revised upward) and yeah, every first-report stat for the last two years has been revised worse a month or a quarter later when nobody's paying attention, but this simply isn't their style - the internal WTFery of this report is just a bit much.
What's really bothering me is that so many of my data collection points have been rendered invalid. They've hidden all the TARP and other-related-plan details, they've wrecked any real ability to collect data on fundamental interest rates through "extraordinary measures," they've fucked the nonborrowed reserves data in the banking system (by letting borrowed reserves count as nonborrowed, because hey, why not?), they've hidden the ABX and CMBX historical data behind firewalls (surprise! that's new), they corrupted the inflation data back in the 90s to cut social security while pretending they weren't, the same for the Federal spending numbers in the Bush era, and and and.
THIS IS NOT TRANSPARENCY.
That... confusing... consumer-spending number, by the way, added a whole point and a half to GDP. It's mostly in durable goods (+9.4% what!), but it's up across the board (nondurable +1.3%, services +1.5%), in theory. Kick that out to flat - which would still be a sharp improvement over the previous two quarters - and you're looking at a decline of 7.6% annualised. If any of these numbers mean anything.
Look, when it comes right down to it, we're going to get a good test of Keyesnian economics here, and one of the things they're going to test is whether the bond market will put up with it. If the bond market will go along, it has a chance of success - tho' at what spending cost I can't say. So far, the bond market is going along. Brad Setzer says foreign central bank purchases - in particular, China - are not as important going forward, based on plummeting US imports. And functionally, the non-lending of banks granted massive TARP funds has resulting in them acting as sterilisers - isolators, if you will - of a mass issuance of t-bills. So that's were we are right now.
Here, have misc news:
The surviving Washington Mutual holding and investment company is suing JP Morgan over US$4B that WaMu owns but JP Morgan won't release. BBT is yet another bank revising its loan failure rates climbing. Bank of America may need another $60-$70B, according to one of the firms involved in the "stress tests" being performed by the Fed et al. And commercial mortgages are in trouble at four times the year-ago rate, as of 4Q 2008 vs. 4Q 2007. 1Q 2009 should come in worse, if the data I'm seeing are good indication.
AIG has convinced an important trader not to leave, a departure which would've triggered $234B in unwinds, to which I can only go what the fuck kind of contracts you writing, people?! The UAW workers will own a 55% stake in Chrysler, under current plans - but it may not survive that long, with talk of forced bankruptcy by the end of the week if creditors don't relent.
Chinese oil demand fell 6% in 1Q 2009, but that excludes any purchase made to build stockpile reserves. Power output fell 1.3%; this implies more slowdown than is being reported.
More local money, this time in Pittsboro, NC. And Marketwatch's Paul Ferrell wants racketeering charges against Goldman Sachs.
That's all for now. Good luck.
I have no idea what to think. The 1Q GDP report came in much worse than expected - down an annualised 6.1% rather than the 4.7% concensus (or 5.1% Marketwatch) expectations, and really quite bad, on the whole. But the market is jumping on a 2.2% rise in consumer spending in the report.
But I don't understand where "consumer spending rebounded to rise 2.2%" comes from given massive layoffs and massive increases in saving rates. Not to mention a 34.1% decline in imports (which tend to be consumer goods) and! a fall of 1% in prices! (Remember, that price deflation thing? You're soaking in it!) So it's not inflation, and it's not income, and it's not credit, and it's not imports, and it's certainly not manufacturing capacity (at record lows), it's not government spending (still down 1Q, and tax revenues are cratering - the sales tax numbers scream that this 2.2% number is bullshit) and sure, inventories are down - implying fire-sales - but not as much as expected. So where's the money coming from and what are they buying?
I mean, sure, I've been calling shenanigans on some government statistics for a while (c.f. how the savings rate across a two year period magically got revised upward) and yeah, every first-report stat for the last two years has been revised worse a month or a quarter later when nobody's paying attention, but this simply isn't their style - the internal WTFery of this report is just a bit much.
What's really bothering me is that so many of my data collection points have been rendered invalid. They've hidden all the TARP and other-related-plan details, they've wrecked any real ability to collect data on fundamental interest rates through "extraordinary measures," they've fucked the nonborrowed reserves data in the banking system (by letting borrowed reserves count as nonborrowed, because hey, why not?), they've hidden the ABX and CMBX historical data behind firewalls (surprise! that's new), they corrupted the inflation data back in the 90s to cut social security while pretending they weren't, the same for the Federal spending numbers in the Bush era, and and and.
THIS IS NOT TRANSPARENCY.
That... confusing... consumer-spending number, by the way, added a whole point and a half to GDP. It's mostly in durable goods (+9.4% what!), but it's up across the board (nondurable +1.3%, services +1.5%), in theory. Kick that out to flat - which would still be a sharp improvement over the previous two quarters - and you're looking at a decline of 7.6% annualised. If any of these numbers mean anything.
Look, when it comes right down to it, we're going to get a good test of Keyesnian economics here, and one of the things they're going to test is whether the bond market will put up with it. If the bond market will go along, it has a chance of success - tho' at what spending cost I can't say. So far, the bond market is going along. Brad Setzer says foreign central bank purchases - in particular, China - are not as important going forward, based on plummeting US imports. And functionally, the non-lending of banks granted massive TARP funds has resulting in them acting as sterilisers - isolators, if you will - of a mass issuance of t-bills. So that's were we are right now.
Here, have misc news:
The surviving Washington Mutual holding and investment company is suing JP Morgan over US$4B that WaMu owns but JP Morgan won't release. BBT is yet another bank revising its loan failure rates climbing. Bank of America may need another $60-$70B, according to one of the firms involved in the "stress tests" being performed by the Fed et al. And commercial mortgages are in trouble at four times the year-ago rate, as of 4Q 2008 vs. 4Q 2007. 1Q 2009 should come in worse, if the data I'm seeing are good indication.
AIG has convinced an important trader not to leave, a departure which would've triggered $234B in unwinds, to which I can only go what the fuck kind of contracts you writing, people?! The UAW workers will own a 55% stake in Chrysler, under current plans - but it may not survive that long, with talk of forced bankruptcy by the end of the week if creditors don't relent.
Chinese oil demand fell 6% in 1Q 2009, but that excludes any purchase made to build stockpile reserves. Power output fell 1.3%; this implies more slowdown than is being reported.
More local money, this time in Pittsboro, NC. And Marketwatch's Paul Ferrell wants racketeering charges against Goldman Sachs.
That's all for now. Good luck.
no subject
What I fear is a so-called "jobless recovery," where people at the top return to business as usual while unemployment and homelessness increases and we develop a new poor/homeless class that gets ignored. Once you're homeless you no longer have a "voice" or any power at all. You cannot even vote.
What worries me is what we are not being told.
no subject
no subject
I just don't get it. I mean, I don't know - maybe it's real! I don't know how, but maybe it is! But my default assumption at this point after all the absolute bullshit being dumped into so many numbers is that I just assume that anomalies like this are probably political and manipulatory. But the lack of clarity and certainty in the validity of the data is worse, from my standpoint, than any benefit you might get from that kind of manipulation!
It's extremely frustrating.
no subject
no subject
My old nabe in Manhattan (Inwood, just above Dyckman Street) was full of shops which specialised in shipping white goods (fridges, propane stoves, even whole gen-sets) back down to the Caribbean and Latin America. They used to do a rip-roaring business whenever the general economy was tanked. Thinking 1994-1997 most acutely, of course.
Anyway, a thought, worthy of the $0.00 you paid for it.
no subject
no subject
no subject
http://www.publicradio.org/columns/marketplace/scratchpad/2009/04/chrysler_hits_the_wall.html (http://www.publicradio.org/columns/marketplace/scratchpad/2009/04/chrysler_hits_the_wall.html)
The effect THAT has on the market and the automotive industry as a whole should be....interesting, no?
no subject
Futures are flat to slightly up, fwiw.
no subject
no subject
Sure, there are a few states without sales tax (Oregon, for example), but...
no subject
and... i don't know. internet ordering? that tends to a lot of the times skip on tax. but not even half the time so...
i admit, i am not good at econ. i have been studying it trying to really figure it out, but its a long hard slog. (its why i read yo, you know - you explain some things no one else does :)
didn't some of the stimulus start in January?
i am just guess as to cause, because i can't think of any other reason.
no subject