solarbird: (Default)
solarbird ([personal profile] solarbird) wrote 2009-05-11 11:38 pm (UTC)

Yeah, but you can't compare the Great Depression numbers directly. The U-3 this appears to be using for everything since July '74 is not comparable to the old pre-war estimate methods. It's worse than comparing season and non-seasonal. I don't know about '47 but it's not important since that isn't graphed.

(All that said, I don't think the U-6 line is the right number either, tho' a lot of people say it's closest, but I'm pretty sure part-time work in the Depression would've counted. Maybe the U-5. But to counter that, you have the problem that women mostly weren't counted in the GD, which throws everything off yet again.)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting