My reading indicates that the initiative was already challenged on that basis as an attempt to block it from the ballot, but such challenges do change their character after passage, so there'll be another go. But this is a fundamentally different issue than the marriage ruling; the reasoning won't be the same. So the previous ruling is not a particularly good indicator in this case.
no subject
My reading indicates that the initiative was already challenged on that basis as an attempt to block it from the ballot, but such challenges do change their character after passage, so there'll be another go. But this is a fundamentally different issue than the marriage ruling; the reasoning won't be the same. So the previous ruling is not a particularly good indicator in this case.
But I'm sure we'll see soon.