solarbird: (Default)
solarbird ([personal profile] solarbird) wrote 2008-06-26 08:51 pm (UTC)

I've spent a lot of time studying authoritarian systems. They usually involve some form of consent of the governed, tho' obviously not always. And what we have now as a de facto system is authoritarian. It's not particularly oppressive, which is different; there are "soft" and "hard" authoritarian systems, at least in theory - tho' in reality they trend towards oppression more and more over time.

I will gladly say that the US is not very oppressive at this point - at least, not internally. It's certainly, absolutely not. But the structures, outside the court system (...barely...), are now authoritarian in outline and function, and I stand by that. An authoritarianism of angels would still be authoritarian.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting