I don't want to turn away from anomaly. The vote should be audited.

What I have a problem with is excitable language like "horrified," " desperately stupid," "sloppy," "rage," and "disaster" used to describe a statistical anomaly that without corroborating evidence of fraud is nothing more than a mathematical curiosity (these were all in solarbird's original post about this on 1/9, and are mild compared to what people were saying in other places where this story was being propagated). I also think it's irresponsible to pass on information from Andrew Sullivan without pointing out that he has a well-known grudge against the Clintons.