Banking, as a natural nexus of power concentration, is involved in most historic encounters of the post-Enlightenment. Assigning banking definitive agency in all those events is a pretty reliable sign of a very unpleasant and unstable individual.
Nothing ever happens for one reason, and nobody has reliable control of anything. ETA: I see that you're some flavor of Buddhist; I'm basically talking about interpenetration here.
Re: I agree that the level of harm is far, far, far less in this case...
Nothing ever happens for one reason, and nobody has reliable control of anything. ETA: I see that you're some flavor of Buddhist; I'm basically talking about interpenetration here.